Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
J Clin Med ; 10(11)2021 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1244048

ABSTRACT

Clinical implications of neurological problems during intensive care unit (ICU) care for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients are unknown. This study aimed to describe the clinical implications of preexisting neurological comorbidities and new-onset neurological complications in ICU patients with COVID-19. ICU patients who were isolated and treated for COVID-19 between 19 February 2020 and 3 May 2020, from one tertiary hospital and one government-designated branch hospital were included. Clinical data including previous neurological disorders were extracted from electronic medical records. All neurological complications were evaluated by neurointensivists. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate independent factors in ICU mortality. The median age of 52 ICU patients with COVID-19 was 73 years. Nineteen (36.5%) patients had preexisting neurological comorbidities, and new-onset neurological complications occurred in 23 (44.2%) during ICU admission. Patients with preexisting neurological comorbidities required tracheostomy more frequently and more ventilator and ICU days than those without. Patients with new-onset neurological complications experienced more medical complications and had higher ICU severity score and ICU mortality rates. New-onset neurological complications remained an independent factor for ICU mortality. Many COVID-19 patients in the ICU have preexisting neurological comorbidities, making them at a high risk of new-onset neurological complications.

2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(7): e24437, 2021 Feb 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1125890

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: To describe the clinical and demographic characteristics of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Daegu, South Korea, and to explore the risk factors for in-hospital mortality in these patients.Retrospective cohort study of 110 critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU in Daegu, South Korea, between February 18 and April 5, 2020. The final date of follow-up was April 20, 2020.A total of 110 patient medical records were reviewed. The median age was 71 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 63-78 years). During the study period, 47 patients (42.7%) died in the hospital. The most common SARS-CoV-2 infection related complication was acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in 95 patients (86.4%). Of the 79 patients (71.8%) who received invasive mechanical ventilation, 46 (58.2%) received neuromuscular blockade injection, and 19 (24.1%) received ECMO treatment. All patients received antibiotic injection, 99 patients (90%) received hydroxychloroquine, 96 patients (87.3%) received lopinavir-ritonavir antiviral medication, and 14 patients (12.7%) received other antiviral agents, including darunavir-cobicistat and emtricitabine-tenofovir. In the multivariable logistic regression model, the odds ratio of in-hospital death was higher with APACHE II score (OR = 1.126; 95% CI = 1.014-1.252; P  = .027).The in-hospital mortality rate of critically ill patients with COVID-19 was approximately 40%. Higher APACHE II score at admission was an independent risk factor for death in these patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Critical Illness/mortality , Critical Illness/therapy , APACHE , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Drosophila Proteins , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Membrane Proteins , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
3.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0243528, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-968571

ABSTRACT

Although the lungs are major targets for COVID-19 invasion, other organs-such as the kidneys-are also affected. However, the renal complications of COVID-19 are not yet well explored. This study aimed to identify the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with COVID-19 and to evaluate its impact on patient outcomes. This retrospective study included 704 patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized at two hospitals in Daegu, Korea from February 19 to March 31, 2020. AKI was defined according to the serum creatinine criteria in the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. The final date of follow-up was May 1, 2020. Of the 704 patients, 28 (4.0%) developed AKI. Of the 28 patients with AKI, 15 (53.6%) were found to have AKI stage 1, 3 (10.7%) had AKI stage 2, and 10 (35.7%) had AKI stage 3. Among these patients, 12 (42.9%) recovered from AKI. In the patients with AKI, the rates of admission to intensive care unit (ICU), administration of mechanical ventilator (MV), and in-hospital mortality were significantly higher than in patients without AKI. Multivariable analysis revealed that old age (Hazard ratio [HR] = 4.668, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.250-17.430, p = 0.022), high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (HR = 1.167, 95% CI = 1.078-1.264, p < 0.001), elevated creatinine kinase (HR = 1.002, 95% CI = 1.001-1.004, p = 0.007), and severe AKI (HR = 12.199, 95% CI = 4.235-35.141, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the cumulative survival rate was lowest in the AKI stage 3 group (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the incidence of AKI in patients with COVID-19 was 4.0%. Severe AKI was associated with in-hospital death.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , COVID-19 , Critical Care , Hospital Mortality , Patient Admission , SARS-CoV-2 , Acute Kidney Injury/blood , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Acute Kidney Injury/mortality , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Rate
5.
Heart Lung ; 50(1): 21-27, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-872091

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused an epidemic of critical patients, some of whom have been treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). This purpose of study is to describe the clinical course of COVID-19 patients treated with ECMO. METHODS: A multicentered study of critical patients with COVID-19 treated at six hospitals in Daegu was conducted between January and April 2020. RESULTS: Among the 80 patients receiving mechanical ventilation support, 19 (24%) were treated with ECMO included (median age 63.0 years). Eight of the 19 patients (42%) were weaned off ECMO (9.8 days, IQR 7.0-13.7). Among them, four patients were also weaned off mechanical ventilation (33.4 days, IQR 29.3 - 35.7), three were still receiving mechanical ventilation (50.9 days), and one expired after ECMO weaning. According to the univariate analysis, the factor that was associated with successful ECMO weaning was vitamin B12 treatment (p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 epidemic, ECMO weaning and mortality rates were 42% and 58%, respectively.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Humans , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Respiration, Artificial , SARS-CoV-2
6.
J Korean Med Sci ; 35(39): e349, 2020 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-853913

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUNDS: The severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread worldwide. Cardiac injury after SARS-CoV-2 infection is a major concern. The present study investigated impact of the biomarkers indicating cardiac injury in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on patients' outcomes. METHODS: This study enrolled patients who were confirmed to have COVID-19 and admitted at a tertiary university referral hospital between February 19, 2020 and March 15, 2020. Cardiac injury was defined as an abnormality in one of the following result markers: 1) myocardial damage marker (creatine kinase-MB or troponin-I), 2) heart failure marker (N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide), and 3) electrical abnormality marker (electrocardiography). The relationship between each cardiac injury marker and mortality was evaluated. Survival analysis of mortality according to the scoring by numbers of cardiac injury markers was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled. Twenty-two patients (57.9%) had at least one of cardiac injury markers. The patients with cardiac injuries were older (69.6 ± 14.9 vs. 58.6 ± 13.9 years old, P = 0.026), and were more male (59.1% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.013). They showed lower initial oxygen saturation (92.8 vs. 97.1%, P = 0.002) and a trend toward higher mortality (27.3 vs. 6.3%, P = 0.099). The increased number of cardiac injury markers was significantly related to a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality which was also evidenced by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The increased number of cardiac injury markers is related to in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Myocardium/metabolism , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Creatine Kinase, MB Form/metabolism , Electrocardiography , Female , Heart Injuries/metabolism , Heart Injuries/pathology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardium/pathology , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/metabolism , Pandemics , Peptide Fragments/metabolism , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Sex Factors , Tertiary Care Centers , Troponin I/metabolism
7.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 68(4): 2059-2065, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-797741

ABSTRACT

To curb the COVID-19 pandemic, isolation measures are required. Shared room occupancy is recommended when isolation rooms are insufficient. However, there is little evidence of the applicability of shared and single room occupancy for patients with COVID-19 to determine whether shared room occupancy is feasible. COVID-19-infected patients admitted to the Daegu Dongsan Hospital of Keimyung University from 21 February 2020 to 20 April 2020 were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to hospital rooms. Clinical symptoms, underlying diseases and epidemiological data of patients were analysed after dividing participants into a shared room occupancy group (group A) and a single room occupancy group (group B). Outcomes analysed included microbiological cure rates, time to clinical symptom improvement, time to defervescence and negative-to-positive conversion rates of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results during hospitalization. A total of 666 patients were included in this study, 535 and 131 patients in groups A and B, respectively. Group B included more underlying conditions, such as pregnancy and solid organ transplantation, and was more closely associated with severe pneumonia during hospitalization. Besides, no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of negative PCR rates at HD 7 and 14, conversion rates of PCR results from negative-to-positive, as well as time to the improvement of clinical symptoms, and time to defervescence were observed. Our results suggest that the shared room occupancy of patients with mild symptoms could be an alternative to single room occupancy during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Animals , Bed Occupancy , COVID-19/veterinary , Female , Male , Pregnancy , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Yonsei Med J ; 61(9): 826-830, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-745127

ABSTRACT

We retrospectively reviewed patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections who were admitted to an intensive care unit in Daegu, South Korea. The outcomes of patients who did (cases) or did not (controls) receive darunavir-cobicistat (800-150 mg) therapy were compared. Fourteen patients received darunavir-cobicistat treatment, and 96 received other antiviral therapy (controls). Overall, the darunavir-cobicistat group comprised patients with milder illness, and the crude mortality rate of all patients in the darunavir-cobicistat group was lower than that in the controls [odds ratio (OR) 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.89, p=0.035]. After 1:2 propensity-score matching, there were 14 patients in the darunavir-cobicistat group, and 28 patients in the controls. In propensity score-matched analysis, the darunavir-cobicistat group had lower mortality than the controls (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.52, p=0.009). In conclusion, darunavir-cobicistat therapy was found to be associated with a significant survival benefit in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Cobicistat/therapeutic use , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Darunavir/therapeutic use , HIV Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Case-Control Studies , Cobicistat/administration & dosage , Cobicistat/adverse effects , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Critical Illness , Darunavir/administration & dosage , Darunavir/adverse effects , Female , HIV Protease Inhibitors/administration & dosage , HIV Protease Inhibitors/adverse effects , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
9.
Diabetes Metab J ; 44(4): 602-613, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-721570

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic that had affected more than eight million people worldwide by June 2020. Given the importance of the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) for host immunity, we retrospectively evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of moderate-to-severe COVID-19 in patients with diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a multi-center observational study of 1,082 adult inpatients (aged ≥18 years) who were admitted to one of five university hospitals in Daegu because of the severity of their COVID-19-related disease. The demographic, laboratory, and radiologic findings, and the mortality, prevalence of severe disease, and duration of quarantine were compared between patients with and without DM. In addition, 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matching was conducted with the DM group. RESULTS: Compared with the non-DM group (n=847), patients with DM (n=235) were older, exhibited higher mortality, and required more intensive care. Even after PS-matching, patients with DM exhibited more severe disease, and DM remained a prognostic factor for higher mortality (hazard ratio, 2.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 4.15). Subgroup analysis revealed that the presence of DM was associated with higher mortality, especially in older people (≥70 years old). Prior use of a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor or a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor did not affect mortality or the clinical severity of the disease. CONCLUSION: DM is a significant risk factor for COVID-19 severity and mortality. Our findings imply that COVID-19 patients with DM, especially if elderly, require special attention and prompt intensive care.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alanine Transaminase/metabolism , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aspartate Aminotransferases/metabolism , Betacoronavirus , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , COVID-19 , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/metabolism , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/metabolism , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Lymphocytosis , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/metabolism , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Prognosis , Propensity Score , Proportional Hazards Models , Quarantine/statistics & numerical data , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Thrombocytopenia
10.
Korean J Radiol ; 21(11): 1265-1272, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-690643

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the prevalence of pneumonia in novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients using chest radiographs to identify the characteristics of those with initially negative chest radiographs, who were positive for pneumonia on follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort data of 236 COVID-19 patients were reviewed. Chest radiography was performed on admission, with serial radiographs obtained until discharge. The 'positive conversion group' was defined as patients whose initial chest radiographs were negative but were positive for pneumonia during follow-up. Patients with initially positive chest radiographs were defined as the 'initial pneumonia group.' Patients with negative initial and follow-up chest radiographs were defined as the 'non-pneumonia group.' Clinical and laboratory findings were compared between groups, and predictors of positive conversion were investigated. RESULTS: Among 236 patients, 108 (45.8%) were in the non-pneumonia group, 69 (29.2%) were in the initial pneumonia group, and 59 (25%) were in the positive conversion group. The patients in the 'initial pneumonia group' and 'positive conversion group' were older, had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) and lactate dehydrogenase levels, and lower absolute lymphocyte counts than those in the 'non-pneumonia group' (all p < 0.001). Among patients with negative initial chest radiographs, age ≥ 45 years (odds ratio [OR]: 3.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.76-8.75, p = 0.001), absolute lymphocyte count < 1500 cells/µL (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.03-4.89, p = 0.041), and CRP > 0.5 mg/dL (OR: 3.91, 95% CI: 1.54-9.91, p = 0.004) were independent predictors for future development of pneumonia. CONCLUSION: More than a half of COVID-19 patients initially had normal chest radiographs; however, elderly patients (≥ 45 years of age) with abnormal laboratory findings (elevated CRP and low absolute lymphocyte counts) developed pneumonia on follow-up radiographs.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Thorax/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Female , Humans , L-Lactate Dehydrogenase/metabolism , Lymphocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Republic of Korea , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
11.
J Korean Med Sci ; 35(26): e246, 2020 Jul 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-634802

ABSTRACT

There is still a paucity of studies on real-world outcome of screening clinic for hospital protection from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As the number of COVID-19 cases was growing rapidly in Daegu, Korea, we started operating an active screening clinic outside the hospital premises. Over two weeks, 2,087 patients were screened using real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, with 42 confirmed cases. Before the screening clinic period, an average of 36 beds (maximum 67 beds) per day were closed due to unrecognized COVID-19 patients entering the hospital. In contrast, after the screening clinic operated well, only one event of closing emergency room (25 beds) occurred due to a confirmed COVID-19 case of asymptomatic patient. We report the operational process of screening clinic for COVID-19 and its effectiveness in maintaining the function of tertiary hospitals.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Mass Screening/methods , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Betacoronavirus/genetics , COVID-19 , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Republic of Korea , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL